|
David T. Burns
Title
Design of a Six Degree of Freedom Haptic Interface
Abstract
A six degree-of-freedom manipulandum with force-feedback capabilities was designed for the
use as an interface in virtual environments and teleoperators. Of specific interest is its
application to astronaut training. The manipulandum should be able to simulate the
mechanical behavior of a wide range of tools in a zero gravity environment. The device is
made up of two, three degree-of-freedom mechanisms coupled by a variable length linkage
which also serves as the manipulandum's handle. The tip of each 3 dof mechanism can be
positioned arbitrarily in 3-space. A fixed-length rod connecting the two tips would have
five controlled dof, but would be unable to rotate about its own axis. However, expanding
and contracting the variable length linkage will rotate the handle about the axis of the
linkage resulting in the sixth degree of freedom. A cable driven differential transmission
is used for each of the three degree of freedom mechanisms allowing all six actuators to
be fixed to ground. The kinematic parameters were chosen such that the usable workspace,
with no singularities, is approximately one cubic foot in translational motion, and
plus/minus ninety degrees in endpoint orientation space.
Source: Masters Thesis, Northwestern University; August, 1996
|
|
|
Chris L. Kapuscinski
Title
Motor Selection and Damper Design for a Six Degree of Freedom Haptic Display
Abstract
The overall thrust of this research was to design a motor/damper system for a proposed six
degree of freedom haptic device designed by Burns [2]. First, the thesis addresses the
importance of damping in providing stable and "real" touch feedback to the user.
Second, the work addresses motor issues regarding advantages/disadvantages to brushed
versus brushless motors, different commutation methods, and position feedback sensors.
Finally, damper design issues are discussed. These issues include: 1) torque sensor
selection and setup, 2) cancellation of noise caused by internal and external loads, and
3) advantages of damper adjustability.
Source: Masters Thesis, Northwestern University; March, 1997
|
p1-30
p31-60
p61-77
|